The first thing to break down is exactly what is meant by the term “enslavement”. I think that the angle being taken here is that modern life and society presents itself as this enslavement. Through the dehumanisation of individuals, as nameless, faceless cogs in one large corporate machine, individuals may view themselves as slaves in this regard. Yet the argument could also be made for the individual’s enslavement to consumerism, on the other side of the corporate equation. Rather than being a cog within a corporate machine, they instead become IV drips of money, greedily drained by Big Business for profit. Regardless of the approach taken towards what enslavement truly means, the question stills remains, as to whether Virginia Woolf’s belief in the power of imagination as a tool for liberation, is truly valid. The answer to this question, is that sadly, there is no one answer. The ambiguity and personal nature of what enslavement truly means to an individual, in turn, means that the universal prescription of imagination that this statement alludes to, is somewhat hard to justify. As has been seen, enslavement can take many forms, and to each individual different methods, different approaches will provide to them, freedom, and liberation. Whether that be the power of imagination, or something completely different, to believe fully that imagination is the key to liberation, is perhaps too simple an answer, given the complexity of the parameters set. That is not to say though, that imagination holds no merits. As Woolf’s works make abundantly clear, the imagination is most definitely a powerful tool.